On Monday, Republicans in key battleground states plan to introduce an “alternate slate’” in the event that they can successfully contest former Vice-President Joe Biden’s win in Congress on January 6.

According to President Donald Trump’s senior advisor, Jason Miller, they proposed a strategy to introduce an “alternate slate” in case that they can challenge the election results on the Senate floor. Miller explained that the U.S. Constitution does not specifically require electors to vote in favor of the majority votes in their respective states. He noted that electors are usually chosen from a list of prominent party officials.

In preparation, he said that electors held a meeting in their own states to discuss an alternate slate who would formally cast their votes. The plan is part of the various strategies that the President’s legal team employed to exhaust every opportunity to contest the results. “This would ensure that all of our legal remedies remain open,” the Trump adviser said.

If Miller’s plan succeeds, it would be the first time in the entire country’s history that a faithless elector changes the election results. However, the President continued to stand by the fact that he is willing to do everything to contest the results, believing that the Democratic party had deployed a wide-scale election fraud. In addition, other Republican figures also agreed that Biden stole his way to become president.

Michigan tried to do the same tactic and vote in Congress; however, their plan was turned down. Reports also cite that the electors met in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania in an attempt to cast a conditional vote for Trump. GOP electors also reconvened in Georgia in an attempt to establish an “alternate Republican slate.”

Republicans in Wisconsin also tried to do the same. In a statement from Andrew Hitt, Chairman of the Wisconsin Republican Party, he claimed that introducing an “alternate slate” would ensure the integrity of the election while they are still awaiting the final results.

Other media outlets such as Reuters had already predicted in October that an alternate slate might take place. This is not the first time that the concept of an alternate slate was seriously considered. In 1876, electors arrived in a deadlock, until finally, they were able to resolve the matters three days before the Inauguration day.

Last week, the Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote to dismiss the state of Texas’ lawsuit against four battleground states such as Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia. Texas argued that the key states violated Article III of the Constitution after it had passed a wider mail-in ballot election rule through executive order without going through the state legislature. Trump called the case a “big one” and filed a motion to intervene.

On Sunday, the President remained adamant, stating that the fight for the dubious election results was far from over. He also shared his fears that the country might possibly have an “illegitimate president.”

On the other hand, Biden continued to rub salt in the wound stating that the huge election turn-out clearly demonstrates the will of the people. He also urged the President to concede and respect the election results. “Our democracy—pushed, tested, threatened—proved to be resilient, true, and strong,” Biden said.