On Sunday, former Secretary of State and failed Presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton, lashed out against Republican voters by accusing them of being a “coward” and “spineless enablers.”

Clinton attacked Republican supporters during an interview with New York Times Opinion podcast host Kara Swisher. During the conversation, the failed Presidential candidate made a bizarre assumption that most Republican voters wanted to “close the page” on President Donald Trump. Clinton continued by saying that most of these voters hoped for Trump’s defeat in the upcoming elections, but “they can’t say it publicly.”

In the interview, Clinton also threw fiery words against the Republican supporter claiming that they “have been cowards, spineless enablers” of the President. When asked about the upcoming general elections, Clinton claimed that she cannot allow herself to think of the possibility that her former opponent might win his re-election bid. In fact, Clinton declared that it made her “sick” to her stomach to imagine another four years of the Trump administration. The Democrat also added that it would be a “cognitive dissonance of a grave degree.”

While the former Secretary of State lost the Presidency to Trump in the 2016 elections, the failed nominee continued to remain bitter about her loss. In the interview, the Demoaccused Trump of living in a “specter of illegitimacy.” Clinton explained that she doesn’t believe Trump knows any boundaries or even has a conscience. She continued by depicting Trump as someone that is untruthful or had any moral compass. Instead, Clinton believed that the President is driven by his goal to “lift himself up.”

When asked about Trump’s suggestion to “lock-her up” following reports of the controversy that he is using private email servers to send confidential state files, the failed nominee said that she would never suggest such a thing because she believed in the “rule of law.”

During the conversation, Clinton also declared that she would have been the most competent person to handle the coronavirus pandemic. In fact, the former Secretary of State unabashedly declared that she would have acted and responded better than what the present administration did. “I have no doubt, especially if it were me,” Clinton said, noting that she was born to do the role.

Moreover, Clinton also stated that she would have followed the recommendations that were made by director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci.

The failed candidate’s argument might have been based on an article from the New York Times, which suggests that countries with female leaders fared better in dealing with the coronavirus pandemic than those headed by male leaders. The article cited several key female figures, including New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen, German Chancellor Angela Merkel.